The rules are the rules, but having some flexibility is also a good thing. During a singles match between
Federico Staksrud and
Connor Garnett, a dispute arose relating to a line call and the replay review. Staksrud had already incurred a technical warning, so when he received another technical, it resulted in a point penalty. Staksrud requested the head referee come to the court, which any player has the right to do, requesting a review of the on-court referee’s call. But, that request is not without consequences. If the head referee determines the in-court call was correct, another technical is assessed. If the player has a time out left, they would lose it, for example. But, as Staskrud was out of time outs, appealing to the head referee would result in a disqualification. So, when head referee Don Stanley got to the court, instead of just making a ruling, he first asked Staskrud if he wanted a ruling, explaining the consequences. When Staksrud understood he could be disqualified, he withdrew his objection. Stanley could have just made a ruling and enforced the letter of the rule, but instead he exercised some discretion and a great match played on to an 11-9 score in game three. Rules are there for a purpose, and we should follow the rules, but a little discretion at the right time is a good thing and a smart decision by Don Stanley allowed a great match to finish where it should; on the court.
I have written before about how the two-handed backhand is becoming more prevalent. It is a shot that was almost unknown five years ago; today is a used by many players. We see that with just about every match.
Ben Johns and
Federico Staksrud are examples of top players who used to hit all backhands with one hand, who now will employ the twoey at times. Where will the trend lead? More on this in a future column. For now, watch the matches and see how often the twoey is used and how it is used.
For now, back to the courts and men’s and women’s doubles.